KristineS
12-26-2008, 01:12 PM
It seems to me that I've been seeing a lot of things lately that say they are reviews of a product or service, but are really thinly disguised sales pitches. I have to say this annoys me. When I read a review of something, I want it to be informative and I expect it will help me form an opinion about the product or service being reviewed. If it doesn't do that, it's useless to me.
I thought it would be interesting to start a discussion about what should be in a good review. I'd also like to know what factors have an impact on how much weight you place on a review.
First, what should be in a good review. In my opinion, the review has to contain an opinion. That's the most important thing. If the review is simply, hey look at this new thing, it's not a review, it's simply publicity. A good review should help me form an impression of a product.
Second, one thing that impacts how much weight I place on a review is the reputation of the person or persons doing the reviewing. As an example, let's say Wired magazine is reviewing new computer gadgets and so is Joe's Computer Blog. I'll probably place more emphasis on and trust in Wired's review, because I know and like the magazine.
What about the rest of you? What do you think should be in a good review? What factors impact how much weight you'll give a review?
I thought it would be interesting to start a discussion about what should be in a good review. I'd also like to know what factors have an impact on how much weight you place on a review.
First, what should be in a good review. In my opinion, the review has to contain an opinion. That's the most important thing. If the review is simply, hey look at this new thing, it's not a review, it's simply publicity. A good review should help me form an impression of a product.
Second, one thing that impacts how much weight I place on a review is the reputation of the person or persons doing the reviewing. As an example, let's say Wired magazine is reviewing new computer gadgets and so is Joe's Computer Blog. I'll probably place more emphasis on and trust in Wired's review, because I know and like the magazine.
What about the rest of you? What do you think should be in a good review? What factors impact how much weight you'll give a review?